Yesterday I wrote about Canon’s new products. I said that Canon shooters had reason to be excited. That was before I delved into the specifications of the new Canon products. Frankly, if I was into Canon, I’d be a bit disappointed. Here’s why.
5D Mark II
A close reading to the spec sheet indicates that all Canon did was take the old 5D body and add the 1Ds Mark III sensor plus 1080P video. The body is still poorly designed from the ergonomic perspective and nothing was done to that idiotic power switch on the back. In addition, the body is still not fully weather sealed. At 3.9 fps the continuous drive is average, at best. The auto focus was not upgraded and remains at 9 AF points. The new sensor dust reduction and expanded ISO range are nothing special either. Neither is the viewfinder. The new 5D still does not allow users to employ EF-S lenses. I could go on, but why bother. You’ll figure it out. Can I please have my D700 back now?
Power Shot G10
I test drove a G9 a while ago and wound up returning it. I found it too small and poorly designed to hold steady. In any event, I like a real viewfinder, not a pinhole. The body had too many buttons and wheels for something so small. The G10 does nothing to correct these flaws. As Mike Johnston observed:
“Canon seems to have taken the original Gx concept about as far as it can go—or possibly just a little further. . . the G10 crams every imaginable feature around an overstuffed, overly small sensor that still has inherent limitations despite its admittedly high degree of technical refinement and optimization. The camera sure does tick off all the boxes in terms of features, though. It has so many modes (26!) and capabilities that it really requires quite a sophisticated photographer even to understand it all (leading to an idle and somewhat snarky question—wonder how many G10 buyers will actually master this camera in all its subtle capabilities? And how many buyers will use it through an entire ownership period without ever really knowing everything it can do, and how to do it?).”
My biggest problem with the G10, however, is the increase to 14.7 megapixels. Thom Hogan deconstructs a G9 image
here. By trying to cram an ever larger number of pixels on a small sensor we are given the unpalatable choice of either underexposing and producing obvious and undesirable noise or exposing correctly and risking photo site well saturation. Sensors with big photo sites don’t have either problem
Thom notes:
“Put another way, the very small photo sites of the current compact cameras have bookend problems: noise at the low end, blowouts at the high end. Getting a great image out of them thus becomes a balancing act that sometimes requires absolute compromise at one end.”
I can’t see how going from 12.1 mega pixels to 14.7 can do anything other than make this problem worse. Not my ideal hiking camera.
24mm f/1.4 L II USM LensPerhaps the best news from the Canon camp yesterday was the introduction of a new 24mm f/1.4 L II USM fast aperture wide angle prime. To my way of thinking this shows Canon’s commitment to continue to be a leader in the production of professional grade primes. I can only hope Nikon will catch on. What is the good of having professional grade bodies without professional grade lenses to go with them?